I mean… no matter what “loose ends” you consider… at this point, foreign nations have observed the remnants of our moon landings with their own orbiters. I heard that people alive at the time of the landings observed the puffs of dust when the astronauts departed the surface with their own eyes through powerful telescopes. What more do we need? You may as well question whether or not Washington actually crossed the Delaware. I mean… show me the evidence.

The next question is ” how come we can see foreground astronaut detail in Pics when the Sun is behind him so his front should be black?” Well the earth is a Big reflector, The astronaut taking the photo has a big mirrored visor and the moons surface reflects a lot of light too (ever see skiers wearing sunglasses!!).

Next question would be “how come there is no engine sounds when the astronauts are coming in to land and are talking on the radio?”. Simple - Sound does not travel in a vacuum. The microphones are in the helmets.

On the flip side: “where are the blast craters under the LEMS?”. That’s a big problem for me.

“How come the astronauts got through the Van allen belt without getting radiation burns?” -This could be down to secret materials that Nasa wouldn’t want to make public knowledge. We’ll let this one slide.

Lastly “Why are some of the cross hairs in the moon pics behind objects even though they are etched into the camera lens. Also why are pics taken miles from each other the exact same landscape/rock formations?”. This is the real crux of hoax theories. If Nasa had admitted they jazzed up the pictures for publicity and to keep their budgets then we wouldn’t have so many disbelievers. The pics are definately doctored. No question about it. But I think it’s just bad publicity management by Nasa.

Like I said , where are the blast craters? Not even dust on the LEM feet. This is impossible. Even Nasa engineers can’t explain this away.

Thomas - you need to have more tolerence man. That’s what science and exploration is about. Questions Answered , Answers Questioned..That’s what seperates man from monkeys.

Thanks for letting me post anyway Thomas. I Look forward to hearing anybodys thoughts.

PS. anybody want to answer “why is the flag waving about in the video pictures?”- Maybe it’s a result of the stiff bar across the top and the twisting motion of the flag by the astronaut. Bit like the transfer of motion down a slinky

1969 images + Reconstruction of a 3D surface image from multiple images requires extremely accurate rendering. There for 3D image generation is easy to manipulate.

http://developer.apple.com/business/macmarket/riacsnasa.html

“There’s no stars in the Apollo pics. Therefore the black background can’t be outer space.”

Intelligent and learned response:

Stars as we’re used to seeing them at night are much, much dimmer than a fully sunlit landscape. When you take a picture on a bright sunny day, the shutter speed required to get a good picture without overexposing the film with reflected sunlight is too fast for dim stars to even hope to show up. On the moon, full daytime has just as much sunlight as full daytime on Earth because the moon never really gets much farther from the sun than 93,000,000 + roughly a quarter million for the Earth-moon distance. That means similar shutter speeds for cameras on the moon are required, which means no stars show up.

Maybe if you moon-hoax-mentality type people would put your God-given brain to work instead of listening to other morons, this wouldn’t surprise you. Of course, you’re allowed to believe anything you want. You have every right to be wrong.

Get a paper route or something, please. Keep busy.