Comments on: Wallpapers: Three From Apollo http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/ Imaging the bodies of our Solar Sysytem Thu, 17 May 2012 13:23:35 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Puppies for sale uk http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-6314 Puppies for sale uk Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:43:41 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-6314 Thanks so much! So useful Thanks so much! So useful

]]> By: Dave The Space Man http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-1567 Dave The Space Man Sat, 12 Apr 2008 04:39:13 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-1567 Very nice! I like the moon walk one the best! Very nice! I like the moon walk one the best!

]]> By: thomas http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-136 thomas Fri, 02 Feb 2007 06:05:50 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-136 i think i was drunk when i originally made those. i think i was drunk when i originally made those.

]]> By: thomas http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-130 thomas Wed, 31 Jan 2007 05:14:07 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-130 fixed fixed

]]> By: thomas http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-128 thomas Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:07:18 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-128 oh my… it was apollo 16. oh my… it was apollo 16.

]]> By: thomas http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-127 thomas Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:52:42 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-127 HRM… i see… you are again correct. 9 was the first test of the lunar vehicles and since 8 orbited the moon i assumed that 9 did as well… ass-umption. Now I have to figure out where that image came from. Definitely too close to the moon to be in Earth orbit… it must be from 10. HRM… i see… you are again correct. 9 was the first test of the lunar vehicles and since 8 orbited the moon i assumed that 9 did as well… ass-umption. Now I have to figure out where that image came from. Definitely too close to the moon to be in Earth orbit… it must be from 10.

]]> By: Gordan http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-126 Gordan Tue, 30 Jan 2007 13:36:39 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-126 Not to nit-pick again :) but in that orbital pic it states the source as Apollo 9. This can't be right as 9 never left Earth orbit. IIRC it was a checkout of the LEM in low Earth orbit. Not to nit-pick again :) but in that orbital pic it states the source as Apollo 9. This can’t be right as 9 never left Earth orbit. IIRC it was a checkout of the LEM in low Earth orbit.

]]> By: thomas http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-125 thomas Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:53:52 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-125 I REALLY want to do some resizes for other monitors, but doing it in PS would be so slow. So, I am hoping to make a screensaver which I can just set some numbers and screen grab the new layout proportions. That will likely come after I have posted all the wallpapers, of which I have about 80 and posted around 50 at this point. I REALLY want to do some resizes for other monitors, but doing it in PS would be so slow. So, I am hoping to make a screensaver which I can just set some numbers and screen grab the new layout proportions. That will likely come after I have posted all the wallpapers, of which I have about 80 and posted around 50 at this point.

]]> By: thomas http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-124 thomas Tue, 30 Jan 2007 12:50:45 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-124 DOH! I am such a n00b. Smart enough to remember that 13 failed, but stupidly… I just multiplied by 3 which does not account for each mission one man stayed in orbit while only 2 descended to the surface. So yes… the number would be 12 on the surface and 18 total astronauts on those missions which landed men on the moon (fixed). DOH! I am such a n00b. Smart enough to remember that 13 failed, but stupidly… I just multiplied by 3 which does not account for each mission one man stayed in orbit while only 2 descended to the surface. So yes… the number would be 12 on the surface and 18 total astronauts on those missions which landed men on the moon (fixed).

]]> By: Terry T. http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-123 Terry T. Mon, 29 Jan 2007 18:07:21 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-123 I really like the orbital pic. I just came across the YH! post for this blog and feel horrible I haven't been here sooner. You have some of the best news/imagery regarding anything space-related. The layouts of these wallpapers is very nice, indeed. I would like, however, the consideration for a non-landscape variety as well. Unfortunately, I don't have a widescreen display, though I prefer those kinds of desktop images. I really like the orbital pic.

I just came across the YH! post for this blog and feel horrible I haven’t been here sooner. You have some of the best news/imagery regarding anything space-related. The layouts of these wallpapers is very nice, indeed.

I would like, however, the consideration for a non-landscape variety as well. Unfortunately, I don’t have a widescreen display, though I prefer those kinds of desktop images.

]]> By: Gordan http://wanderingspace.net/2007/01/wallpapers-three-from-apollo/#comment-122 Gordan Mon, 29 Jan 2007 15:35:17 +0000 http://wanderingspace.net/?p=205#comment-122 Isn't the number 12 people, not 18? Apollos 11,12,14,15,16,17... Isn’t the number 12 people, not 18? Apollos 11,12,14,15,16,17…

]]>